Re: Bits from the RM
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, cobaco wrote:
> I'd agree if there had been a rewrite of kdelibs or something, but kde 3.1 ->
> 3.2 is evolutionary without big changes to what was already there.
It does not take a big change to break software...
e.g., openssh changed a message and the sftp kioslave broke
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51359
I think you are missing the point of "stable", and Debian's users who
don't would be more disappointed with just released software in stable
than with somewhat out-dated software.
Keep in mind that if this experiment works, "testing" will end up
being what you wish "stable" was, at least that is how I see it.
- Bruce
Reply to: