[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <jfs@computer.org>] Accepted makepasswd 1.10-1.1 (all source)



On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 03:16:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I had been hoping that I wouldn't have to resort to adding a stick to
> the various carrots, but evidently we have developers who aren't taking
> care to measure twice before cutting once.
> 
> The 0-day NMU period has *not* started, and will not start until the 23rd.
> People who abuse this privlege by not applying a due amount of care
> to their NMUs will have their NMU privileges revoked in their entirety
> until the 0-day NMU period ends on 2003-09-15.
[...]
> > From: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <jfs@computer.org>
> > Subject: Accepted makepasswd 1.10-1.1 (all source)
> > Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 21:32:06 -0400
> > To: debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
> > Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
> > 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Format: 1.7
> > Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 02:40:37 +0200
> > Source: makepasswd
> > Binary: makepasswd
> > Architecture: source all
> > Version: 1.10-1.1
> > Distribution: unstable
> > Urgency: low
> > Maintainer: Johnie Ingram <johnie@debian.org>
> > Changed-By: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <jfs@computer.org>
> > Description: 
> >  makepasswd - Generate and encrypt passwords
> > Closes: 44788 50885 147808 168492 190485
> > Changes: 
> >  makepasswd (1.10-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
> >  .
> >    * Non-maintainer upload.
> >      Since the rules have changed and this package has not
> >      (since potato) I'm uploading to 0-delay. This upload will
> >      not fix any RC bugs but at least will (almost) remove all
> >      the bugs open for this package, and it didn't take me
> >      much time to figure these out...

In addition, you should probably check the WNPP before uploading
apparently unmaintained packages. In this case, you would have found
that (a) makepasswd has been orphaned, so all this NMU verbiage was
unnecessary, and (b) I'd filed an ITA, and a mail to me would probably
have kicked me into action enough to finish adopting it, since I'd fixed
all these bugs locally already. (I'd been a bit slow to get round to
uploading this, granted; sorry about that.)

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]



Reply to: