Re: stable revision? (woody 3.0r2)
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 09:32:52AM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Am 17.08.03 um 19:22:58 schrieb Matt Zimmerman:
> > I don't know if Joey has his own reasons, but we definitely need to get
> > a boot-floppies kernels built for all architectures for the next point
> > release. There have been several major security fixes to those kernels
> > since 3.0r1.
>
> Ah, shouldn't we backport the fixes instead of introducing a new version
> here?
And why would you assume that we aren't? You may have noticed the
corresponding -bf2.4 kernels in the security advisories for i386.
--
- mdz
Reply to: