On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 18:02, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 01:02:13PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > > I long for the day when binaryless uploads are mandatory (and this is > > coming from someone who's been bitten by FTBFS more than once ). > > Somebody comes up with this about once every month or two. It remains > bogus. Why do you think that it would be more likely to build if the > maintainer builds it zero times instead of one? It seems fairly > evident to me that this would make FTBFS issues *more* common, not > less. Because if it doesn't build, it doesn't enter the archive, because there are no packages to enter the archive. -- Joe Wreschnig <piman@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part