Re: Ideas about allowing Co-maintainer
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 09:18:00AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> I would not. Usually people use the abbreviation "RFS".
Ok, have it your way:
$ ( zcat ~debian/lists/debian-devel/debian-devel.200*.gz ;
ls ~debian/lists/debian-devel/debian-devel.200* |
grep -v \\.gz\$ |
xargs cat ) |
grepmail -Y From -i -e Goswin |
grep ^Subject: |
sort -u |
grep -iE 'NMU|RFS|sponsor|upload|help|developer|please'
Subject: Re: "Recompile with libc6 from testing" <-- doesn't help i think!
Subject: Re: Has a Debian developer ever unintentionally wiped out user files like Apple?
Subject: Re: ITP TinyMUSH (help requested)
Subject: Re: Improper NMU (Re: NMU for libquota-perl)
Subject: Re: Non-Intel package uploads by maintainer
Subject: Re: [devfs users]: evaluate a patch please
Subject: Re: making sponsorship easier and make (love && (!war))
Subject: Re: patched mount to follow symlinks, please test and audit
Subject: patched mount to follow symlinks, please test and audit
And before someone starts to think it, I'm not trying to "prove" that
Goswin is lying (I don't think he is). I'm just saying that if you
want people to help you, you have to help others help you, this is a
volunteer project and people try to admin their time in the most
effective way they find (well, when they are not involved in pointless
discussions about how the project is evil and a total failure, that
is). Yammering about how people don't pay attention to you doesn't
help. HINT. HINT.
--
Marcelo
Reply to: