On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:18:44 +0200 Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr> wrote: > Quoting Arnaud Vandyck <arnaud-guest@users.alioth.debian.org>: [...] > > The package should be renamed to libsaxon-java to complain the current > > java policy. > > > > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/x102.html > > > > Resolved by the patch I attached (with new upstream and so): > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=154155 > > > > libsaxon-java (6.5.2-1) unstable; urgency=low > > I'm trying to understand: according to the description, saxon is a collection > of tools, not a collection of libraries. Collection of java libraries. > If so, lib-saxon-java should be renamed to saxon (we don't care if it was > written in java); that was Michael's point. > Otherwise, the description is wrong and must be changed accordingly. IMHO the description is wrong. -- Arnaud Vandyck http://alioth.debian.org/users/arnaud-guest/ http://alioth.debian.org/developer/diary.php?diary_user=2781
Attachment:
pgphlMufz3y4z.pgp
Description: PGP signature