Re: About NM and Next Release

[Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>]

Josef Spillner <spillner@kde.org> writes:

> That being said, the cyclic mentioning of non-openness problems on d-d does 
> not invalidate the fact that those who invest time into a project are 
> steering it, independent of whether they're a "member" or not (true also for 
> KDE and certainly other projects).

And here is another important reason to become DD:

To steer the project.

Policy changes, voting and the internal discussions all need
membership. Having NMs hang in limbo without due cause is denying them
the right to those.

MfG
        Goswin