On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:56:44PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Andrew Suffield wrote: > >I'm not sure there are any good ones other than having some specific > >(technical, not political) things you want to see done and are willing > >to do. In that case, you won't have to be told to demonstrate stuff - > >you'll just do it, because you want to. > Wrong. There have been specific technical things I wanted to do > which simply cannot be done easily as an outsider. > > Generally it's QA stuff. I'm doing it anyway, of course; it's just > slower and more tedious and discouraging. You just contradicted yourself. It's clearly not wrong - you *are* doing it anyway. So the system works as it is supposed to. > Incidentally, the entire NM system seems geared toward package > maintainers only, if you read the web pages. (That was not > particularly encouraging.) Coincidental but true. We have a good understanding of how to deal with package-maintaining applicants. Others are harder. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
pgpwAk4_sYXu4.pgp
Description: PGP signature