Re: NM non-process

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: NM non-process
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 23:41:42 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030806214142.GC19452@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030806140740.GC32090@alcor.net>
References: <20030721173812.GA613@twcny.rr.com> <[🔎] 87k79r3344.fsf@mrvn.homelinux.org> <[🔎] 20030806124120.GI25407@alcor.net> <[🔎] 20030806133338.GA10216@mails.so.argh.org> <[🔎] 20030806140740.GC32090@alcor.net>

* Matt Zimmerman (mdz@debian.org) [030806 16:20]:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:33:38PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Matt Zimmerman (mdz@debian.org) [030806 14:50]:

> > > Why is this a danger?  This is one of the freedoms provided by free
> > > software, which we work hard to promote.

> > Because it would be a waste of work, time and energy.

> Not if the projects have different goals.

I haven't seen different goals from debian, but just frustration.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to:

References:
- Re: NM non-process
  - From: Goswin Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Re: NM non-process
  - From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
- Re: NM non-process
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: NM non-process
  - From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Should this be filed as grave? Gcc-2.95
Next by Date: Re: Should this be filed as grave? Gcc-2.95
Previous by thread: Re: NM non-process
Next by thread: Re: NM non-process
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread