Re: Excessive wait for DAM - something needs to be done
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Excessive wait for DAM - something needs to be done
- From: Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de>
- Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 11:03:37 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] pan.2003.08.06.09.03.37.132708@smurf.noris.de>
- References: <20030715100707.GB28163@hezmatt.org> <slrnbh7p50.4a4.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet> <20030715114621.GA14853@niquia.its.monash.edu.au> <20030715120759.GB14853@niquia.its.monash.edu.au> <87n0ffg8k8.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org> <20030717095536.GA14568@regression.cyrius.com> <pan.2003.07.17.13.31.34.237853@smurf.noris.de> <Pine.LNX.4.56.0307171625110.4604@home.unex.es> <20030717224834.GA2371@regression.cyrius.com> <20030717232651.GJ10141@cerberus> <20030722001253.GC3960@regression.cyrius.com>
Hi, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader wrote:
> In any case, applications will be processed (and some rejected, I'd
> assume) once db.d.o is up again.
Well, it seems to be up now (or at least ping+ssh+ldap'able).
I'll leave the obvious-loaded-question-asking to others. This time. ;-)
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | smurf@smurf.noris.de
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
--
Truth can wait; he's used to it.
Reply to: