[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NM non-process



On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:53:09PM +0200, Rico -mc- Gloeckner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:24:57PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:05:46PM +0200, Rico -mc- Gloeckner wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 06:36:24PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > > Possibly not the best of instructions. For a non-developer to post
> > > > something to -devel-announce, you just need to find a developer who
> > > > will sign and forward the mail. Asking on -qa would probably have got
> > > > you a few offers.
> > > 
> > > Why is that so?
> > 
> > Context error: what are you referring to?
> 
> The context is small enough to recognize:

[Aside] Here's the direct sequence:

> > Asking on -qa would probably have got you a few offers.
> Why is that so?

Hence, ambiguous.

> Why does a non-DD need to find
> a DD to sign and forward the mail to dda? Why cant he sign it himself
> and post it to the list? The message has to be approved by the moderator
> anyway.

Mail to debian-devel-announce is (usually[0]) approved or rejected by a
script which checks signatures against the debian keyring, not by a
human moderator.

[0] With samosa dead, I'm not sure what is currently happening

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: pgpuCpof4hNA7.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: