Hi,
Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> 2 i386 libc support? (The large thread starting with
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200304/msg01895.html
> and going into the May archive talks about this). Do we have to wait for
> upstream to fix this? We want to stay compatible with other distributions
> which broke support for i386 in libc.
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200305/msg00360.html
> describes the current situation.
eh? libc? libstdc++5...
> 2 flex transition: Silently a major revision of flex came into unstable
> and broke parts of openoffice.org, postgresql and many others. flex-old is
> now available so a slower transition can be allowed while not delaying
> sarge.
.. when the people update their Build-Depends....
OOo is going to be fixed in 1.0.3-3 btw to work with the new flex...
> 3 Ooo (OpenOffice.org 1.0.3?): More info at least on the debian ooo
> mailing list, is there a status site?
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openoffice.org.html shows some info
That do you want to have wrt status?
OOo is in testing now (1.0.3-2), 1.0.3-3 is in preparation..
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A
EB73
Attachment:
pgp0LL8I3V4hH.pgp
Description: PGP signature