On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 04:53:32PM +0200, mcINEK wrote: > W li?cie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 16:38, Wouter Verhelst pisze: > > What's that supposed to mean? Doing that does have its advantages, too > > (such as "you don't have to re-integrate everything with the new > > system"). > > > > Granted, pushing that to extremes will end you up with an unworkable > > system with hundreds of incompatible API's. That's not what this does. > > But only if this API is good. It is, IMHO. > If API is wrong and don't have support for > new useful options, Who says it doesn't? > should be changed or improved. API is a solid, > stable base for building additions, however, it must be simple and > thought over. Besides, it's not such a basic feature, which requires > change system core. No, but lots of applications use it. -- Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org Nederlandstalige Linux-documentatie -- http://nl.linux.org "An expert can usually spot the difference between a fake charge and a full one, but there are plenty of dead experts." -- National Geographic Channel, in a documentary about large African beasts.
Attachment:
pgpbpFRKVStc7.pgp
Description: PGP signature