Bug#192730: ITP: annoyance-filter
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I intend to create a package for 'annoyance-filter'.
Here a short description from the man page of annoyance-filter:
annoyance-filter - automatically detect junk mail
uses Bayesian statistics to determine the probability an E-mail
message is junk based on an analysis of its contents compared to
collections of known junk and legitimate E-mail.
annoyance-filter can be found at:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/annoyance-filter/
As far as I can see is the licence of 'annoyance-filter' DFSG compliant:
The annoyance_filter program is in the public domain.
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this
software and its documentation for any purpose and without
fee is hereby granted, without any conditions or
restrictions. This software is provided "as is" without
express or implied warranty.
The files "getopt.c", "getopt.h", and "getopt1.c" are
redistributed under the terms of the GNU General Public
License, Version 2. Please refer to this license in
the file COPYING.GNU for details. Building an executable
program incorporating these components subjects the
resulting binary to the terms of COPYING.GNU.
The CWEB Literate Programing utilities included in the
"cweb" directory are provided for your convenience and do
not constitute part of this program; please see the
"cweb/README" file for additional information. The
version of CWEB included with this program is not
necessarily the latest (though it was when the program
was written). The latest version is always available
from:
http://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/cweb.html
The statistical library uses the DCDFLIB Double Precision
Cumulative Distribution Function Library developed by the
Section of Computer Science, Department of Biomathematics,
University of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital. Current source
code for DCDFLIB may be downloaded from:
ftp://odin.mdacc.tmc.edu/pub/source/dcdflib.c-1.1.tar.gz
The authors have contributed this software to the public
domain. See DCDFlib/README for additional details.
Reply to: