On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:05:03AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> I'm not against this package. What I am against is if you tout it as
> having none of the problems of RSH. It has all of the design flaws
> inherent in the protocol. You need to make that obvious, and only tout
> this as a rewrite, better code and nothing more.
I did not claim it has none of the _problems_ of rsh, I said it fixed
the _bugs_ in rsh, two very different things in this case. Just like
power/mara/djbdns avoid the bugs found in bind, they don't fix any of
the inherent problems of DNS itself.
I shouldn't have to make it obvious it just fixes bugs in the code,
that'd only reinforce the lack of distinction some people can make.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.eu.org>
Attachment:
pgpwhL1WLUHRT.pgp
Description: PGP signature