Re: libpng3 upgrade will remove kde development packages
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 12:17:46AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mer 23/04/2003 à 22:23, Josh Metzler a écrit :
>
> > Shuttle:/home/josh# apt-get -s install libpng3
> > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > The following extra packages will be installed:
> > libpng12-0
> > The following packages will be REMOVED:
> > kdelibs4-dev kdesdk kspy libarts1-dev libartsc0-dev libpng12-0-dev
> > libqt3-mt-dev
> > The following held packages will be changed:
> > libpng12-0 libpng3
>
> This should be fine if you tell apt-get to install libpng12-dev
> explicitly.
> BTW, shouldn't APT deal with this case (conflicts/replaces/provides)
> automatically ?
It might have something to do with him having libpng12-0 libpng3 set to
hold? When I attempt to install kdelibs4-dev here it seems to work
correctly:
singularity:~# apt-get install kdelibs4-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libart-2.0-dev libarts1 libarts1-dev libartsc0 libartsc0-dev libasound2-dev
libaudio-dev libaudiofile-dev libcupsys2 libcupsys2-dev libfam-dev
libfreetype6-dev libglib2.0-dev libjpeg62-dev liblcms1-dev libmad0-dev
libmng-dev libogg-dev libpcre3-dev libpng12-dev libqt3-headers libqt3-mt-dev
libvorbis-dev pkg-config qt3-dev-tools xlibmesa-gl-dev xlibmesa-glu-dev
xlibs-dev zlib1g-dev
The following NEW packages will be installed:
kdelibs4-dev libart-2.0-dev libarts1-dev libartsc0-dev libasound2-dev
libaudio-dev libaudiofile-dev libcupsys2-dev libfam-dev libfreetype6-dev
libglib2.0-dev libjpeg62-dev liblcms1-dev libmad0-dev libmng-dev libogg-dev
libpcre3-dev libpng12-dev libqt3-headers libqt3-mt-dev libvorbis-dev
pkg-config qt3-dev-tools xlibmesa-gl-dev xlibmesa-glu-dev xlibs-dev
zlib1g-dev
The following held packages will be changed:
libarts1 libartsc0
3 packages upgraded, 27 newly installed, 0 to remove and 7 not upgraded.
Need to get 11.7MB of archives. After unpacking 42.8MB will be used.
Reply to: