Re: [debian-devel] Status of mICQ code audit
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:26:13 +1000, Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> said:
> Harmful to Debian even if possibly not harmful to the user. This
> could be clarified in the next DWN article on the topic (now that
> Rudi has started the debate again another DWN article is probably
> due anyway).
I disagree, and I have posted reasons in another message why
this could be harmful to users as well.
manoj
--
If you always postpone pleasure you will never have it. Quit work and
play for once!
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: