At Wed, 2 Apr 2003 19:49:10 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Le Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 11:41:58PM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI écrivait: > > > We decided to imose a naming convention already for people who wish to > > > use alioth for package maintenance. They have to name their project > > > "pkg-<package>" ... > > > > Some package, such as auto-apt, fakeroot or so, were already created > > without pkg- prefix. A "pkg-" prefix is used only for comaintainance > > for non native debian package? > > Yep. > > You don't need the "pkg-" prefix if alioth is the main host for upstream > development. The "pkg-" prefix is required for projects whose goal are > to maintain the Debian package of a software which is hosted somewhere > else. I understand. > > I'm considering that I maintain ca-certificates on alitoh, can I use > > "ca-certificates" for alioth project name, or should I use > > "pkg-ca-certificates" ? > > ca-certificates should be ok I guess since it's debian specific. I see, I'll register ca-certificates then. > > Anyway, alioth.debian.org uses certificates issued by SPI > > (C=US, ST=Indiana, L=Indianapolis, O=Software in the Public Interest, > > OU=hostmaster, CN=Certification Authority/emailAddress=hostmaster@spi-inc.org) > > and SPI's certificates are not known, so browser complains about it. > > > > I think that it is the SPI's certificates that ca-certificates should provide, > > and I'd like to do it, but how can I get it? Whom should I ask? > > Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net> Thanks. Wichert, would you please send me SPI's public certificates? Then, I'll put it in ca-certificates package to let SSL clients for SPI related services such as alioth.debian.org verify its connections or so. Thanks in advance, Fumitoshi UKAI
Attachment:
pgp7oj9zqJkcq.pgp
Description: PGP signature