On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 07:00:03PM +0100, Davide Puricelli wrote: > I don't think we should remove micq and I'll try to explain my idea: > Rüdiger Kuhlmann, upstream author of micq, with this "anti debian easter > egg" showed to the world that there are some big problems between him > and the Debian maintainer of micq, so we should analyze these issues; I > just read the BTS page of micq, there are a lot of bugs reported by > him, and #167606 seems to be the "cause of scandal". From reading the BTS that is a pissed upstream maintainer if I ever saw one. I don't know if I should cry or laugh with this issue. Javi
Attachment:
pgpQmvzEKcarn.pgp
Description: PGP signature