Re: Freeze Please?
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 01:47:13PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> Moreover, m68k is too slow to develop. It's another problem.
> In addition, it's not only m68k but also mips/mipsel, arm, ...
> Especially, there are not developer's machine for mips/mipsel. If you
> want to drop m68k, I think we should drop mips/mipsel in first, not
> m68k (I'm sorry for mips/mipsel maintainers, who are working greatly,
> but it's true that there are no mips/mipsel machine!).
There are machines for mips and mipsel; they are just not "official" Debian
systems maintained by the Debian system administration team. Please take a
look at http://www.debian.org/ports/mips for a list. Florian Lohoff
(email@example.com) hosts the mips and mipsel autobuilders and some machines
available for interactive logins. In case a Debian developer needs an
account on a mips/mipsel system, just ask him (or in case he is not
available, me) for a account. The mips and mipsel autobuilders are keeping
up quite well, so building speed is not a problem on mips and mipsel.
Nach Paragraph 28 Abs. 3 Bundesdatenschutzgesetz widerspreche ich der Nutzung
oder Uebermittlung meiner Daten fuer Werbezwecke oder fuer die Markt- oder