Re: Status of Heimdal and Amavis
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Brian May wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 08:29:33AM +0100, Mikael Andersson wrote:
> > > Heimdal appears to work fine, as far as I could test it on sid.
> > > Hence I will upload it to Debian ASAP.
> > >
> > > However, the version I compiled for woody is a different
> > > story.
> > >
> > > snoopy:unstable:~# netstat --tcp -a -n -p | grep kdc
> > > tcp 0 0 226.122.44.64:4352 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 8355/kdc
> > > tcp 0 0 226.122.44.64:512 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 8355/kdc
> > > tcp 0 0 226.122.44.64:4992 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 8355/kdc
> > > tcp 0 0 226.122.44.64:4993 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 8355/kdc
> > > tcp 0 0 226.122.44.64:4994 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 8355/kdc
> >
> > Isn't addresses >= 224.0.0.0 Multicast addresses? Some kind of multicast
> > address to the nearest kdc?
Any chance the source is doing extremely braindamaged things such as trying
to guess the structure of the socket strucs ? netsnmp tried to do that, and
fucked up royally...
Differences in glibc might be causing the bug to show up...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to: