[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libgl1 vs C++ transition, round 2



Le lun 27/01/2003 à 16:52, Marcelo E. Magallon a écrit :
>  In particular, it is _not_ a problem if a program ends up linking
>  against two different libstdc++ libraries, right?  It's inefficient,
>  but otherwise irrelevant.  I just want to make sure before I remove the
>  otherwise misleading "c102" bit from the libglu1c102 package.

Are you sure this won't cause trouble ? Maybe I'm forgetting something,
but AFAICS the old libstdc++ is not built with versioned symbols, and I
don't think ld can handle that.

-- 
 .''`.           Josselin Mouette        /\./\
: :' :           josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org
`. `'                        joss@debian.org
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: