On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:38:36AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
Maybe there should be a "testing-secure" variant of testing into which "unstable" security updates get forced right away. Then prudent users could track that instead of testing.
Except that would further encourage the *absolutely false* impression that testing is just a "more reliable" version of unstable. *It* *is* *not*. Mike Stone