[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

libXXXc102 should NOT provide libXXX



Just read in imagemagick's changelog that new package libmagick++5.5.3c102 
(g++ 3.2 ABI) Provides: libmagick++5 (g++ 2.95 ABI).

Shouldn't this be reported as a serious bug?

This will cause blind upgrades from old libmagick++5 (that is in Woody) to a 
library with an incompatable ABI, causing all software (not locally-built, 
but installed from Debian!) linked to the library to break.



Reply to: