[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Another pbuilder run finished

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:27:35 +0100, Russell Coker
<russell@coker.com.au> wrote:
>On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:04, Marc Haber wrote:
>> Actually, the root requirement was a reason for me not to use
>> pbuilder. And personally, I would not like to have an automated
>> building process running as root on any box that has productive jobs.
>What if the process is in a secure chroot provided by SE Linux or vserver?

My colleagues have turned down that proposal. They have a point in not
wanting to install kernel patches that are not needed for the
productive work the machine was designed to do.


-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber          |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany  |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature  | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29

Reply to: