Re: Proposal: Debian release numbers
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 09:52, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 12:19, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 15:32, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 09:20:54AM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > >
> > > > Does the gcc 3.2 transition constitute a major enough change? How about
> > > > the inclusion of d-i? KDE 3.1? GNOME 2? Linux 2.4?
> > >
> > > Since Linux 2.4 was included in woody (despite claims by the popular press
> > > to the contrary), I'd say that is definitely not a major change.
> > With gcc 3.2, KDE 3.1, GNOME 2, Linux 2.4 kernel(by default), and
> > XFree86 4.3(maybe?) we can't disagree that sarge is a major upgrade,
> > calling 4 or 4.0.Or not?
> The big change from Deb 2.x to 3.0 was the introduction of the testing
> distribution. I fail to see a similarly big change for 3.1 (sarge)
I can see the d-i(debian installer) as the big change.I'm talking only
about Debian and not about GCC, KDE or GNOME...
Gustavo Franco <firstname.lastname@example.org>