On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 03:24:51AM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 03:54:13PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > > Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp> writes: > > > This makes me wonder: what is so wrong with an epoch ? > > > It's mostly invisible to most interfaces, > > > and only used internally. > > If they were really that invisible, I wouldn't be complaining, 'cause I > > wouldn't have noticed the change! Really they _do_ show up, and they're > > an ugly wart. > You think that's bad? Wait till you see all the c102s. Those will go away eventually. An epoch is forever. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpi79_2ybSu4.pgp
Description: PGP signature