Re: Proposal: Debian release numbers
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 09:46, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Gustavo Franco <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > Since Linux 2.4 was included in woody (despite claims by the popular press
> > > to the contrary), I'd say that is definitely not a major change.
> > With gcc 3.2, KDE 3.1, GNOME 2, Linux 2.4 kernel(by default), and
> > XFree86 4.3(maybe?) we can't disagree that sarge is a major upgrade,
> > calling 4 or 4.0.Or not?
> I think the major version need change when Debian things (like Debconf
> in many packages from potato -> woody, for example) and Debian
> Installer (woody -> sarge) but not because GNOME 2 or others
IMHO, it makes sense and can be adopted as default policy to release numbers.
Gustavo Franco <email@example.com>