Re: Proposal: Debian release numbers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 07:24, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > Just my 0.02EUR: Let's call it after the year when it is going to
> > be released. For example, if Sarge will be ready in this year (what I
> > doubt), it would be called 3.1, and Sarge+1, released 2004, will be
> > Debian 4.0, Sarge+2 somewhere end of 2002 would be called 4.1, etc.
>
> I think you mean "Sarge+2 somewhere end of 2004", right?
Personally I prefer just calling things by the year they're released and
forgetting about version numbers entirely. If I asked you which year RH5.2
came out, you'd probably struggle, but Win95 everyone knows. This also
neatly avoids silly arguments like RedHat is at version 8, and Debian's at
version 3, so RedHat must be more advanced.
All IMHO,
Corrin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+G0Uai5A0ZsG8x8cRAqxxAJ48denuczJO8PngWNqXPLjlnrQWxQCePL1S
rKdrkwF3z/wEV3L1rly/lxA=
=/UGl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: