Hi, Gleydson Mazioli da Silva wrote: > I intent to package the new mailman 2.1 series. I've sent mail some time ago > to Tollef asking if there was any problem in maintaining that new series, but I got no > response (I hope that Tollef see this message :-). [...] > > Initially, I've named this package as mailman21, so it will not conflict > with the original mailman package, so the list administrator could do the > migration without some problems. I've writed all steps to do the upgrade > from mailman 2.0 release to 2.1 release. > > If no objection, I'll upload the package. rene@auric:~$ madison mailman mailman | 1.1-10 | oldstable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc mailman | 1.1-10.1 | old-proposed-updates | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc mailman | 2.0.11-1woody5 | stable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc mailman | 2.0.11-2 | unstable | hurd-i386 mailman | 2.0.13-2 | testing | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc mailman | 2.1-4 | unstable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc rene@auric:~$ I think that makes this ITP obsolete. Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
pgpr6LbdiZrF8.pgp
Description: PGP signature