Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:39:48 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021120153948.GD14809@mizar.alcor.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021119214337.GA1330@matchmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 20021118222832.GA2921@matchmail.com> <[🔎] 20021119013357.GA3397@dragon.kitenet.net> <[🔎] 20021119184712.GA28174@matchmail.com> <[🔎] 20021119195617.GB1947@cibalia.gkvk.hr> <[🔎] 20021119214337.GA1330@matchmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 01:43:37PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:56:17PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > It is customary for developers to use sid on their development systems, and
> > the buildds use that, too.
> 
> I seriously doubt that the buildds actually run on sid.

Uploaded any packages lately?

-- 
 - mdz

Reply to:

References:
- Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
  - From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
- Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
  - From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
- Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
  - From: Josip Rodin <joy@gkvk.hr>
- Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
  - From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: How to programm a Windowmanager ?
Next by Date: Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?
Previous by thread: Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
Next by thread: Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread