Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 19 November 2002 23:10, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:26:04PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >Build daemons _MUST_ build against unstable. They do not always have
> >the absolute latest build-essential packages like GCC, but we try to
> >keep them close.
[snip]
> >And to not testing the versions of the compiler and libraries
> >in unstable. Without which, testing goes to hell.
>
> This explanation discounts the possibility of people testing the
> unstable compilers by building things themselves (outside of the
> buildds.)
It doesn't stop people from using sid themselves, or from using a sid chroot
to build packages/test unstable compilers.
Paul Cupis
- --
paul@cupis.co.uk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE92sexIzuKV+SHX/kRAo5dAJ9+jF8zEN89H40T+fgJuxUNQ+N++QCdGTkR
M/8sM7qez1EjK1JRnLZF6mI=
=oJtR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: