On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 09:02:40AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > PS: And yes I would also vote for opening private after a certain delay. > > IMHO personal affairs (such as vacations) shouldn't be posted on the > web since their is an increasing risk that this information might be > used for mischief (for example, house break-ins). I personally am not terribly interested in seeing information that was shared on -private that would not reasonably be made public [vacations, addresses, phone numbers, etc.] However, in the case Branden mentions, and possibly others, -private has been used to discuss issues that have shapped the future of the project. It would be nice to make (at the very least) historically relevant [or interesting] portions of -private available. Don Armstrong -- I leave the show floor, but not before a pack of caffeinated Jolt gum is thrust at me by a hyperactive girl screaming, "Chew more! Do more!" The American will to consume more and produce more personified in a stick of gum. I grab it. -- Chad Dickerson http://www.donarmstrong.com http://www.anylevel.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Attachment:
pgpUOdHXIhm5a.pgp
Description: PGP signature