Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 03:53, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:45:51AM +0100, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:20:13PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > > but it should be much easier to train apt to do that then train every
> > > > single user to do so.
> > > apt-get source apt; vi...
> > Shouldn't a bug be filed first? I'll do it :) (against 'general' or 'apt')
>
> You don't have to file a bug before you write a patch. Filing a bug is
> probably not going to get it fixed any faster; it's certainly not going
> to give any one the time or skill to do it.
Just a note, Isaac Jones <ijones@syntaxpolice.org> and I have been
working on this a bit. Right now we have made apt download the toplevel
Release file, and we're currently battling libgpgme.
So if anyone else is interested in working on this, please let us know.
Reply to: