Re: Who should I report source audits too?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Who should I report source audits too?
From: Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina <rcardenes@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 03:59:52 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021024025952.GA22328@bifrost.ddts.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021024001622.A21236@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.44.0210231615001.23827-100000@samadhi.braincells.com> <[🔎] 87adl4svmn.fsf@xyzzy.adsl.dk> <[🔎] 20021024001622.A21236@tardis.ed.ac.uk>

On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:16:23AM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
>   If a program is remotely exploitable/crashable should I:

You should re-read the Security Team FAQ[1]. There you'll find answers to
this and other questions.

[1] http://www.debian.org/security/faq

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [desktop] ximian-setup-tools vs webmin
  - From: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <jaldhar@debian.org>
- Re: [desktop] ximian-setup-tools vs webmin
  - From: Peter Makholm <peter@makholm.net>
- Who should I report source audits too?
  - From: Steve Kemp <skx@tardis.ed.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Help! I need an old version of snmp package
Next by Date: Re: [desktop] why kde and gnome's menu situation sucks
Previous by thread: Re: Who should I report source audits too?
Next by thread: Re: Who should I report source audits too?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread