Re: Mutt-testing requires libgnutls-unstable?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Mutt-testing requires libgnutls-unstable?
From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 21:22:07 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021019192207.GA4895@wonderland.linux.it>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E182ovS-00019N-00@mid.downhill.at.eu.org>
References: <[🔎] 20021019013109.GB9627@snoopy.apana.org.au> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0210182340370.727-100000@yakko.doogie.org> <[🔎] E182ovS-00019N-00@mid.downhill.at.eu.org>

On Oct 19, Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org> wrote:

 >Shouldn't it be possible to install two versions of a library package
 >i.e. gnutls4 and gnutls5 at a same time? A conflict in mutt would keep
Yes.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: pgp5cMhkWgYTG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Mutt-testing requires libgnutls-unstable?
  - From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
- Re: Mutt-testing requires libgnutls-unstable?
  - From: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>
- Re: Mutt-testing requires libgnutls-unstable?
  - From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>

Prev by Date: Re: dpkg segfaults
Next by Date: Re: Please, test new phpgroupware packages for woody
Previous by thread: Re: Mutt-testing requires libgnutls-unstable?
Next by thread: Re: Mutt-testing requires libgnutls-unstable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread