Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV INSTEAD OF LIBC6-DEV

To: Daniel Burrows <dnb114@psu.edu>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:31:00 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021016013100.GC1356@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Mail-followup-to: Brian May <bam@debian.org>, Daniel Burrows <dnb114@psu.edu>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021015002230.GB10209@torrent.burrows.local>
References: <[🔎] 20021014224342.GG10464@deadbeast.net> <[🔎] 20021015002230.GB10209@torrent.burrows.local>

On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 08:22:30PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Depends: libc (>= 2.2.5-15)
>               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Why is a versioned dependancy required here?
-- 
Brian May <bam@debian.org>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
  - From: Daniel Burrows <dnb114@psu.edu>
- Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

References:
- JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
  - From: Daniel Burrows <dnb114@psu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
Next by Date: Re: SpamAssassin now used to filter BTS Mail
Previous by thread: Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
Next by thread: Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV

Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV INSTEAD OF LIBC6-DEV