Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV INSTEAD OF LIBC6-DEV

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 02:05:24 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021016020524.1bb870e5.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021015081715.GA22053@reypastor.hispalinux.es>
References: <[🔎] 20021014224342.GG10464@deadbeast.net> <[🔎] 20021014230348.GA23484@lightbearer.com> <[🔎] 200210141641.22422.shalehperry@attbi.com> <[🔎] 20021014235026.GA25024@lightbearer.com> <[🔎] 20021015003907.GA3617@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net> <[🔎] 20021015081715.GA22053@reypastor.hispalinux.es>

Jesus Climent <jesus.climent@hispalinux.es> immo vero scripsit:

> What about erasing the dependency totally?
> 
> From the list of build-essential_7 :

Build-essential is a list of packages required for building
"Debian packages" and Debian packages only. 
People aren't expected to install build-essential (like
dpkg-dev) for building their own binaries, and running
gcc.


regards,
	junichi

-- 
dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa   http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423  7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/

Reply to:

References:
- JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
  - From: "Joel Baker" <lucifer@lightbearer.com>
- Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
  - From: Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <shalehperry@attbi.com>
- Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
  - From: "Joel Baker" <lucifer@lightbearer.com>
- Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
  - From: Jesus Climent <jesus.climent@hispalinux.es>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#164774: libdb4.0: please make it priority standard
Next by Date: Re: Spam: process the web archives?
Previous by thread: Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
Next by thread: Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV

Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV INSTEAD OF LIBC6-DEV