Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV INSTEAD OF LIBC6-DEV

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:23:42 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021014232341.GA13485@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Mail-followup-to: Brian May <bam@debian.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021014224342.GG10464@deadbeast.net>
References: <[🔎] 20021014224342.GG10464@deadbeast.net>

On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 05:43:42PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I WOULDN'T HAVE TO SHOUT LIKE THIS IF PACKAGE MAINTAINERS COULD BE

Did Branden say something?

I think I have gone deaf...

;-)

(sorry; couldn't resist saying)
-- 
Brian May <bam@debian.org>

Reply to:

References:
- JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
Next by Date: Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
Previous by thread: Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
Next by thread: Re: JOEL BAKER, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO DEPEND ON LIBC-DEV *INSTEAD* OF LIBC6-DEV
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread