* Joel Baker (lucifer@lightbearer.com) [021015 01:05]: > 3) If the answer to #2 is 'no', can someone explain to me, in private, why ... or public, please? > pure virtual dependancies are bad, then? They seem like the obvious answer, > so if they're not, I'd like to understand why. (note #1, above, and that > this is a request for enlightenment, not an argument).