Re: gcc-3.2 migration
Eduard Bloch <email@example.com> immo vero scripsit:
> Depends on when we start it. Since nobody suggested a realistic plan
> that would be better than Willy's, we IMHO continue going this way. The
> last showstopper that I heart about are needed modifications on libc to
> allow some architectures usage of gcc-3.2 code.
Another interesting thing that I've been reading through
-bugs-dist is that 163264.
Apparently minor changes exist in glibc 2.3, and
some packages will fail to build.
firstname.lastname@example.org : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4