On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 10:29:16PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote: > On 03/10/2002 Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Why? /usr/share/php/<packagename> would solve the problem in 3), and you > > > could easily include with 'include "<packagename>/file.inc"'. What is > > > the reason to through this idea away? > > > > It mandates an unnecessary standard for resolving namespace conflicts, > > and it is incompatible with upstream naming conventions in the PEAR > > repository (where PEAR is increasingly equivalent to CPAN). > > Then /usr/share/php/inc/<packagename> could be a solution? No, that would be the same proposal as above, with an extra directory needlessly added to the path. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgppvfGePNGjj.pgp
Description: PGP signature