Will Newton wrote: > The idea of "least surprise". What is more suprising to a user, that the > package name is different from upstream, or that the description is slightly > at odds with the package name? > > If anyone else finds this a cause for concern I will think about it, > otherwise I will mark this notabug in a week. Why don't you just append something like this to the description: Note: The "sigsegv" in this software's name is a misnomer; it handles page faults and not segmentation faults. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
pgpN3TclekAVv.pgp
Description: PGP signature