Re: hdparm
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 12:55:25AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> >>proposed silly placeholder file. What ever way we impliment, default
> >>shall be "off" unless someopne write very smart auto detector.
> >
> >The default should be "don't touch this", as the kernel and BIOS _are_ your
> >auto detector.
>
> Huh? Xu's kernels disable dma unconditionally.
Xu's 2.4 kernel series are damn useless as configured by him IMHO. I liked
the 2.2 series, but I have to freaking rebuild the kernel for *every* new
Debian machine, server or desktop I happen to install.
And you are NOT to enable DMA on a kernel that has not been setup for that,
it might screw up data (this advice comes directly from Andre Hedrick).
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to:
- References:
- hdparm
- From: Boris Duerner <bduerner@web.de>
- Re: hdparm
- From: Boris Duerner <bduerner@web.de>
- Re: hdparm
- From: Simon Hürlimann <huerlisi@student.ethz.ch>
- Re: hdparm
- From: Darren Salt <list@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk>
- Re: hdparm
- From: Osamu Aoki <debian@aokiconsulting.com>
- Re: hdparm
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Re: hdparm
- From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>