On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 04:28:47PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> >Just to clarify, fpm is still useful, and in fact I use it on my woody
> >systems. Not sure yet what I will do post-woody...
> >
> >FPM is badly written[1] and buggy, and I don't have time to become
>
> Don't you wonder even a little about using a program with the dual
> description of "badly written and buggy" but whose stated purpose is to
> securely store passwords?
I'll gladly use a functionally equal/superior alternative. Mind to
propose/write one?
*t
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux & Open Source Solutions
http://sourcepole.ch
Elestastrasse 18, 7310 Bad Ragaz, Switzerland
Tel: +41 (81) 330 77 11
-----------------------------------------------------------