On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 04:28:47PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Just to clarify, fpm is still useful, and in fact I use it on my woody systems. Not sure yet what I will do post-woody... FPM is badly written[1] and buggy, and I don't have time to become
Don't you wonder even a little about using a program with the dual description of "badly written and buggy" but whose stated purpose is to securely store passwords? Mike Stone
Attachment:
pgpLDj3AkmKoQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature