Re: Orphaning Unbuildable Packages (fpm)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Orphaning Unbuildable Packages (fpm)
From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 14:06:38 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020922180638.GA22340@dman.com>
Mail-followup-to: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020922180337.GI16614@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net>
References: <[🔎] 20020922165658.GG16614@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.44.0209221903260.13481-100000@petertosh> <[🔎] 20020922180337.GI16614@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net>

> The burden is not on Debian to show that a piece of software has no
> users.

Right, otherwise the yodl fiasco wouldn't have happened.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Orphaning Unbuildable Packages (fpm)
  - From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>

References:
- Re: Orphaning Unbuildable Packages (fpm)
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Re: Orphaning Unbuildable Packages (fpm)
  - From: tomas pospisek <tpo2@sourcepole.ch>
- Re: Orphaning Unbuildable Packages (fpm)
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Orphaning Unbuildable Packages (fpm)
Next by Date: Re: Kerberos support for Cyrus: I need help
Previous by thread: Re: Orphaning Unbuildable Packages (fpm)
Next by thread: Re: Orphaning Unbuildable Packages (fpm)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread