Re: razor v2
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Brian May wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 09:46:13PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > What will you call the package? Are you going to continue to call it
> > razor or will you call it razor2? They are definitely very different
> > and can co-exist.
>
> Does this mean bug #161832 is a non-issue?
If amavis has only 'Use Razor::Client 1.20' (as stated in the report)
but does not use /usr/bin/razor-check from the razor package then it
should have really depended on librazor-perl, not on the razor package.
(razor v2 provides librazor2-perl since their modules are Razor2::etc).
razor-1.20 could be repackaged as librazor-perl and without anything
at /usr/bin, if it helps amavis, but the razor developers have said
several times they plan to deprecate razor v1 service, so eventually
everybody should migrate to v2.
Reply to: