Re: Bug#75853: TONER CARTRIDGES
Quoting Osamu Aoki <debian@aokiconsulting.com>:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 02:55:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > No one is proposing every bug report to go through this process. You
> > > are DD. System can be made to accept all DD mails. (I know spoofing
> > > may become problem.) It looks to me that most good bug reports are from
> > > DD.
> >
> > If it were true that only debian developers made good bug reports, then
> > we'd not need to bother with all these users and public ftp sites and
> > stuff. :-P
>
> Of course. (I do not think I meant such as thing.)
>
> All I wanted to say was bug reports from DD tend to be good quality :)
>
> It looks like everyone agrees that setting up some abuse prevention
> mechanism is needed for the Debian BTS. I am happy with that.
Oki then. We agree no this.
If it isn't ok/desirable with a 'verification mail', how about _REQUIRING_
that the initial bug report (not it's followups) is formated according
to standards (the way 'bug' and 'reportbug' - is there such a command?)
formates the bugreport.
If it isn't, it's put on hold for either human intervention or dropped
completly.
I actually thought that the BTS already did this, but obviosly not.
Oh, and be able to delete a spam mail from the BTS/bug report, like
someone suggested.
--
Albanian Mossad Clinton genetic FSF SEAL Team 6 SDI AK-47 Ft. Bragg
Honduras KGB president ammonium colonel quiche
[See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this]
Reply to: