Re: NMU'ing for wishlist bugs? (aka: intent to NMU bind9)
A NMU was uploaded last night; kill it if you disagree. The only change
from the patch in the BTS is to the README/comments
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:24:50AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
>
[...]
>
> There is more to chrooting a daemon than just specifying a userid, and
> that work is in my queue. It will probably be 2-3 of weeks before I can
> get the package uploaded, though, due to travel.
I didn't try to tackle chrooting, just running as non-root.
>
> > On a related note, with the new NMU policies set in place during woody's
> > freeze, how are NMU's that fix wishlist bugs viewed? I would expect
> > that they'd be frowned upon, unless they add an important/heavily
> > desired feature, and don't break anything.. but I figured I'd ask, just
> > to clarify (as this isn't the only wishlist patch of mine that's being
> > ignored by the maintainer..).
>
> I try to stick to important or higher for my NMU's. Your mileage may vary.
>
> lamont
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
Buying a Unix machine guarantees you a descent into Hell. It starts when
you plug the computer in and it won't boot. Yes, they really did sell you
a $10,000 computer with an unformatted disk drive.
-- Philip Greenspun
Reply to: